The recent terrifying event in Newtown, United
States where a gun man killed 27 people among them 20 children has raised
questions on gun control laws where the President has called for change. Apart
from that, the incident has also subtly introduced debates about television
violence where interestingly, following the shooting, Hollywood, the greatest entertainment
machine in the world, has employed self-censorship (business unusual) of violent
content fearing that it could be insensitive with the news still fresh in the
minds of audiences.
Cable networks like HBO, TLC and NBC either postponed
or cancelled airing programmes with violent content. The Film Society of
Lincoln Center in New York even canceled the screening of Tom Cruise's violent
new movie, “Jack Reacher”. The argument being that, in the wake of national
tragedies, entertainment companies in the US ritualistically assess the content
of their programming to ensure it is not offensive.
However, the Newtown incident is a new challenge
to media scholarship in the United States which dates back to the early
theories of media effects that centered on whether or not, in deed, television
causes violence. The latter position was dismissed in audience research giving
too much credit to the intelligence of the audience as opposed to the power of
media content to influence audiences. Media scholars must now go back to the theoretical
drawing board to methodologically investigate various hypotheses regarding the validity
of claims held about the relationship between television and violence in the
society.
Luckily, with the advent of new media, there are
new ways of investigating media, particularly television, content for violence
which, traditionally, has been centered on audiences, the technology itself and
content. For example, the three dimensions in new media such as interactivity,
demassification and asynchroneity can be used by scholars to follow-up
individual audiences as opposed to mass audiences (demassification) to examine how
they interact with technology such as cable networks and utilize programming
(asynchroneity) and the potential effects of such habits. It will be
interesting to see whether the ‘time worn’ bullet theory will be given a new
lease of life in the new hypotheses that will emerge and possibly new media
theories in the wake of the Newtown event.
For now, Hollywood’s response to the shooting largely
supports the premise that television does influence the audience and its content
can sometimes be offensive. Violent programming has a significant effect on the
audiences and may be the sources of societal violence as evidenced in the July
20 2012 Aurora movie theater mass shooting in Colorado US during a mid-night
screening of the movie “The Dark Night Rises”. Even though the suspect was
being examined for mental illness, he confessed to have wanted to kill people
and law enforcers found a Batman mask in his apartment. Batman is a fictional
comic book and 1986 character of the television series “The Dark Nights Returns”.
No comments:
Post a Comment